Meeting accuracy standards might, for example, include using mixed methods e. Both identify the need to be pragmatic and serve intended users with the goal of determining the effectiveness of a program. Principles of Community Engagement - Second Edition. Section Navigation. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Syndicate. Program Evaluation Minus Related Pages.
Evaluation can be classified into five types by intended use: formative, process, summative, outcome, and impact. They include: Engage stakeholders to ensure that all partners invested in what will be learned from the evaluation become engaged early in the evaluation process. Describe the program to clearly identify its goals and objectives. Design the evaluation design to be useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. Gather credible evidence that strengthens the results of the evaluation and its recommendations.
Sources of evidence could include people, documents, and observations. Justify conclusions that are linked to the results and judged against standards or values of the stakeholders. Deliberately ensure use of the evaluation and share lessons learned from it. Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. Tessa South African. How to say program evaluation in sign language? Numerology Chaldean Numerology The numerical value of program evaluation in Chaldean Numerology is: 3 Pythagorean Numerology The numerical value of program evaluation in Pythagorean Numerology is: 1.
Select another language:. Please enter your email address: Subscribe. Discuss these program evaluation definitions with the community: 0 Comments. Notify me of new comments via email. Cancel Report. Create a new account. Log In. Powered by CITE. Are we missing a good definition for program evaluation? Don't keep it to yourself Submit Definition.
The ASL fingerspelling provided here is most commonly used for proper names of people and places; it is also used in some languages for concepts for which no sign is available at that moment. There are obviously specific signs for many words available in sign language that are more appropriate for daily usage. Browse Definitions.
Get instant definitions for any word that hits you anywhere on the web! Two clicks install ». Quiz Are you a words master? Or do you find it intimidating because you don't know much about it? The purpose of this introductory section is to provide you with some useful background information on evaluation. Evaluation is a process that critically examines a program. It is important to periodically assess and adapt your activities to ensure they are as effective as they can be. Evaluation can help you identify areas for improvement and ultimately help you realize your goals more efficiently.
Additionally, when you share your results about what was more and less effective, you help advance environmental education. The information you collect allows you to better communicate your program's impact to others, which is critical for public relations, staff morale, and attracting and retaining support from current and potential funders. Why conduct evaluations? Evaluations fall into one of two broad categories: formative and summative. Formative evaluations are conducted during program development and implementation and are useful if you want direction on how to best achieve your goals or improve your program.
Summative evaluations should be completed once your programs are well established and will tell you to what extent the program is achieving its goals. Norland, E. From education theory..
Pancer, s. Rossi R H. Evaluation: a systematic approach Thousand Oaks. For additional information on the differences between outcomes and impacts, including lists of potential EE outcomes and impacts, see MEERA's Outcomes and Impacts page. A well-planned and carefully executed evaluation will reap more benefits for all stakeholders than an evaluation that is thrown together hastily and retrospectively. Though you may feel that you lack the time, resources, and expertise to carry out an evaluation, learning about evaluation early-on and planning carefully will help you navigate the process.
MEERA provides suggestions for all phases of an evaluation. But before you start, it will help to review the following characteristics of a good evaluation list adapted from resource formerly available through the University of Sussex, Teaching and Learning Development Unit Evaluation Guidelines and John W. Evans' Short Course on Evaluation Basics :. Your evaluation should be crafted to address the specific goals and objectives of your EE program.
However, it is likely that other environmental educators have created and field-tested similar evaluation designs and instruments. Rather than starting from scratch, looking at what others have done can help you conduct a better evaluation. It ensures that diverse viewpoints are taken into account and that results are as complete and unbiased as possible.
Input should be sought from all of those involved and affected by the evaluation such as students, parents, teachers, program staff, or community members. One way to ensure your evaluation is inclusive is by following the practice of participatory evaluation. Evaluation results are likely to suggest that your program has strengths as well as limitations. Your evaluation should not be a simple declaration of program success or failure. Evidence that your EE program is not achieving all of its ambitious objectives can be hard to swallow, but it can also help you learn where to best put your limited resources.
A good evaluation is one that is likely to be replicable, meaning that someone else should be able to conduct the same evaluation and get the same results.
0コメント